Thank you! I found it via those early footages from those new reels, but the rest of it was very artificially inflated to last 15 minutes, so I spaced out for some parts of the rest of the video.
Yup!
What is funny is that it was still above average for a YT video. At least it was not totally fake news, but just an over-inflated fluff piece “for the algorithm” (YouTube has a much more favourable behaviour towards videos of 10+ minutes, in terms of monetization).
I agree with both of you on that.
The only point I am adding is that some things are only good to get an issue to your attention. Then, if you find the matter to your interest, it is (for better or for worse) in your own hands to do the heavy lifting and look things up. Even if the article/video is of better value, you still have to put in the work because, at the end of the day, even a very well made video/article can be wrong or misleading.
I also agree on the fixable part.
Most of the times now issues seem to be made “for the outrage”, but it is always good to remember that “the news” are not there to just pass the time or distract or aggravate us, but to inform us that “problem X exists - it is probably fixable” and depending on whether it affects us or not, we then go about and see if there is something we need to do or learn on the situation.
I really miss the kinds of news that were very dry and to the point. “This happened, this is the problem, whoever is in charge is trying to fix it, we will keep you updated. Moving on to the next item…”
That would have been some real top-notch investigative journalism. I’d really like that to be the norm, but unfortunately it is very rare nowadays.
haha that’s the funny thing. It did (hence those short TV footages at the beginning) and they did seem to be the kinds of “1 minute reportage” kind of things too, so you are quite on the money there
So, what most probably happened is, that fellow show those small coverages, took the issue and run with it… or, to be exact, walked down the street and talked vaguely about it.
It is more likely what you said earlier. Unlike the usual “I was a normal person that lost everything” kind of immigrant (which is mostly powerless, thus the politicians feel like they can bully them), the politicians and reporters do not tend to mess with foreigners that come from an actual fighting background.