Recently I have decided to start participating in ladders (and quite a few at that), but I am having trouble understanding some of the features behind them. Most of these questions will be answered with experience in the ladders, but I have one specific question to ask: Suppose I was #50 in the ladder and I were to beat #40. Would I automatically slide to #39 in the ladder or do I have to play and beat everyone in between #50 and #40. Probably a pretty obvious question but thank you for your time and help with me on this one!
The people you can challenge are highlighted. This induce you don’t have to go 1 by 1. If you win one you take his place and everyone below (with him included) lose 1 place
My experience with the ladder so far is that you keep going up just by not timing out.
When I reach a high enough level, I’ll probably have to start wining some actual games.
I’m exaggerating a bit
But I do keep going up due to people above me dropping out of the ladder by timing out.
It’s getting slower though, there’s less people above me, and the proportion of players who are determined enough to not drop out is probably higher.
This certainly works when you are lower down the ladder. If you are higher up and not challenging then you drift down as people leapfrog over you. This implies that there is some kind of dynamic equilibrium state/position somewhere in the middle where you are just subject to a kind of brownian motion. Would any stats nuts care to figure out where on the ladders that position is?