(make sure thereās no legal disclaimer about privacy in the mail)
I see sports teams and stuff refusing to play, Champions League changed the venue of the final etc.
Ukraine I see has asked for talks to surrender or something. Where do moves of condemnation stand if both parties reach an agreement? Agreement is obviously under duress, and this is also a greater discussion, but what are yāallās thoughts?
The issue is that Ukraine will likely soon be a Russian satellite state, akin to Belarus. Supporting Ukraine as a member nation in those organization while opposing Russia will be difficult once it is essentially the same.
BBC has an article on Russians seizing Chernobyl earlier and someone thought it was a good idea to plug HBOās series in there.
Iāll say insensitive but I mean worse words.
Yes, unless thereās active opposition that can garner support, but this doesnāt happen immediately.
And itās also a political decision of whether to accept new status quo or support fighters trying to overthrow foreign powers.
I donāt see another cold war happening (which somehow is an outcome to hope for in this scenario), since US seems to hold back as not to expose cracks in the armor.
International PR is important for a government, I agree. Losing your sports venues and a couple of business friends is hard and may lead to loss of profit, I agree. However, is a government who crossed every uncrossable line going to cry bitter tears just because a few other countries decided the equivalent of a #cancelcaviar hashtag?
ā¦
I have a question about āswiftā. How does it hurt other countries if a country gets ousted? I didnāt understand that part of the āswiftā function.
ā¦
ETA
As for China Link
They are not exactly discreet about it and never have been.
SWIFT is a banking system that facilitates payments between countries. It has been reported in the U.S. that Biden did not include SWIFT sanctions because several European countries asked him to hold off. Russia supposedly owes them money, and if they donāt get paid it would greatly damage their economies.
I have no idea. Remember, I was just passing on info from two television news reports I saw last night. I donāt know whether the report is true, although it is certainly plausible. I would not expect any official confirmation of that because to say so would be undiplomatic toward our allies.
The red alert games had some interesting ideas of alternate history lines.
I believe in the first one, something mad like Einstein going back in time to kill hitler before he comes to power, and then the result ends up being that Russia becomes a superpower that invades most of Europe.
Then the second game red alert 2, is a sequel and it maybe naturally (in a biased sense, being a western game) picks the canon ending where the allies win in the first war. It follows with a soviet invasion of America.
It has a very ominous opening sequence, where the Soviets more or less secretly amass troops and then invade not long after itās spotted what they were planning.
They did recently do a remaster of the first game, useful since the original version eventually stopped working on newer machines, and one would have to rely on community driven implementations to play it. I think a lot of people also disliked the third game.