You shouldn’t. Everything needs to be learnt for the first time. There’s no shame in asking when you don’t know, even if the answer seems obvious in hindsight.
2 Likes
To quote myself “Don’t ask questions that you can get the answers to yourself if you put in a little bit of effort.” But I appreciate your reassurance. ^-^
1 Like
In the past I myself have used insulting webpages such as “let me google that for you” to rub it in when people ask “silly” questions, but I don’t anymore. There is a lot of misinformation on the internet, often times these days I’ve found even the simple questions are easiest asked “of a local” 
4 Likes
Can we address, that the title was now changed from “girl” to “female”? I feel bad for Takumi, because these cultural nuances are not straight forward, but this is arguably worse. The correct word to use is “woman”. Using “female” as a noun when talking about women is usually only done by people that see women purely as sex objects. It sounds like you’re talking about animals in a nature documentary.
It is obvious that there was no ill intend, but while we’re on the topic we might as well get it right.
4 Likes
It depends on context.
there its standard to use word “girl”
just Go is more serious thing.
1 Like
I disagree. I think “strongest female go player” is technically correct. As a native English speaker, “strongest woman go player” would sound very strange to my ears.
5 Likes
Like here:
1 Like
How odd, I thought that the most common convention was the opposite of that (that male/female are the more appropriate terms, since they are more formal).
It’s very dependant on situational context. Either could be appropriate or insulting at different times.
“You’re a beautiful female” is an example where woman would be a better choice.
I think it’s insulting when followed by nothing, as “talk to the females”.
When it’s used to characterise, as “female Go player” it does what it’s supposed to do.
ETA: In English. If someone calls me θηλυκό παίχτη I’ll feel very, very weird.
6 Likes
Yes, ‘female Go player’ is correct, female is used as adjective. “Strongest female” on the other hand is not, because female is used as noun.
3 Likes
But let’s be honest, if we’re applying some people’s opinions of sexism to this then the fact that she’s even a female should nat need mentioning. It stresses that females need that kind of attention or something. It might be a big deal in some cases, but to me I just kinda think that it’s not that important practically. This actually doesn’t have much to do with your comment. Huh.
dango 
emoji
1 Like
It is easy to amend the title. This topic is interesting, I see the problem and I will correct it.
10 Likes
In this case it is not about sexism at all. There male/female leagues, tournaments (as well as mixed ones) and male/female titles in Go. There has to be some appropriate term that denotes that and there is nothing wrong with it, as long as those are organised like that.
There is a discussion if that should be organised like that in mind sports/games/activities like Go/Chess/Backgammon/etc, but that is a different topic.
The “αρσενικοί παίχτες” would also have been very weird and it comes with a mental image of playing Go with a κομπολόι, in some stuffy smoky καφενέ from the 50ies and going “ατσά!” or “ώπα!” every time you place a stone hahaha
2 Likes
I have also changed the topic title to match the current video title (which I presume to be Takumi’s preference).
But I believe that it is important to stress this kind of attention.
It is factual that she is (one of) the strongest female players, similar to how one could point out someone is the “youngest” professional player, or a “Western” professional reaching 9d in an East-Asian league, etc…
However, the effect of such attributes is significant as well as important. Stressing that there are people belonging to a certain group reaching certain achievements, serves as inspiration and may challenge people who (unconsciously or not) find such achievements surprising.
You have to put a spotlight on those belonging to the minority in order to combat stereotypes. By highlighting female achievements in Go, you provide role models for girls / women to pick up Go and / or aim at a professional career, and you combat the stereotype that strong professionals are male players. As a comparable example, since about a decade or so, there has been more and more attention to women’s football, and it currently is featured both on television and newspapers in the Netherlands. This has led to a huge increase in the number of girls choosing to join a football club.
9 Likes
A 16-year-old male is called a boy, not a man. Legal adulthood (age of majority) is 18 in the UK and the US, I believe. What’s … er … good for the gander is good for the goose. If such a linguistic practice were to be applied to one sex and not the other, you would have just cause for complaint, but as far as I am aware there is parity here. Under-18 male = boy, under-18 female = girl. You can argue about what the cutoff age should be, but there has to be a cutoff somewhere,
I’m not clear what your point is. Choi Jeong is late 20s. She’s also Korean, hence my grey area comment as where adulthood begins varies across cultures. Calling late 20s men boys is also inappropriate, though is less common. I don’t think OP’s mistake came from a sexist intent but just a translation mistake as a non native speaker of English.
3 Likes
A different issue is that at least in the USA, “girls” and “boys” in a sports context specifically refer to high school (or earlier) divisions. College or open competitions would always use “women” and “men”. When I read the initial post I just assumed it was about a top high school go player, which was apparently completely wrong.
Is this similar in other countries?
3 Likes
Even in the US it varies. Like I’ve said a bunch, it’s very arbitrary and dependent on where you are.