Rankings should reflect strength, so it should be fair.
What if someone dropped the game every time they were about to lose?
OK, you said that the timeout is only once, and the ranking will still be calculated normally.
What about his one timeout in five games that were significantly behind? 10? 20? 100?
Is this system fair?
He can completely achieve airbagging in this way.
He can clock these losing games to approximate times, and the first game opponent to time out is the high Ranker.
You said, you can report him to Moderator and he will be punished.
But the question is why do you say he is malicious?
He could say that he didn’t even know there was such a mechanism.
He could say that he was just thinking hard about a way to win, but he didn’t expect it.
He could say he had something to do on the day he was timed out and didn’t have time to play the game.
how do you say?
A timeout is a loss, and the opponent should win. It is absolutely undisputed that points are awarded for wins and points are deducted for losses.
If anyone is sandbagging, this definitely needs to be handled by Moderator!
If no one reports it or the Moderator doesn’t see it, then it certainly doesn’t need to be dealt with.
You can’t just think it’s reasonable not to calculate the ranking after the timeout because the Moderator has no time to deal with it.
In fact, with so many score cheats, have you let the system handle it automatically?
Have all the Moderators been found?
No.
Score cheating cannot be handed over to the system, so what reason is there for the system to intervene in timeout games?