Translating a known red board one step down, removing some liberties:
This position?
ooh, interesting. Havenât thought of that, frankly, but I wrote my rule down to be sure of the wording, and this here does indeed apply.
Red?
still green
And now itâs red?
Iâll throw out a guess: the green boards are those where there is a 2x2-region with a single black stone and a single white stone, not directly adjacent to each other. (i. e. a shoulder hit shape)
I have a guess, but Iâll hide it so I donât spoil the fun.
My guess
There must be at least one shoulder hit that has not been responded to.
Edit: Basically the same thing. le_4TC beat me by a few seconds
All boards formed by this rule are green, but there are more.
Iâll declare it solved, since all guesses you come up with under these rules will be green. Well done, guys.
My wording is: a black stone or chain and a white stone or chain touch just diagonally.
Wait, isnât this equivalent to le_4TC and RubyMineshaftâs rule?
I think it shouldnât be declared solved if weâve only found a subset of the green, but I believe your rule is what I meant. Perhaps âsingle black stoneâ was misleading, I meant that it was the single black stone in that 2x2-region. Clearly there are multiple examples in the boards weâve tried where the chains touching are larger than one stone
ah yes, single black stone in 2x2. Thatâs right!
Itâs important to distinguish stones and chains. A stone can be part of a larger group of stones or be itâs own chain.
I mean, this is fine too
Ah, my rule doesnât quite cover this one.
Nice rule! I had no idea for a while, and then suddenly it clicked while staring at all the boards at once.
Alright. But if eventually all players only produce green forms, but only using sub-rules, the game has come to an end until the Master makes further input.
The players should guess a rule, and the master should provide a counter-example. In this case, your board above would have been a counter-example to @RubyMineshaftâs suggestion, right? Then we go on looking for the correct rule.
I think itâs nice to provide counter-examples in both directions if possible (like I did once for the second game). If you can only provide a counter-example in one direction, you can let the playerâs know that they found a subset/superset of the green boards.