Especially rare since no new names can have it
Please, letās remember what is right to encourage and how far some people might go in trying to achieve that goal.
I havenāt seen anyone in this thread encouraging self harm.
It depends on the point of view I donāt think that having 1000 games at any given time is something healthy, for example.
(And I am probably the person who has stayed above 1000 for the longest time )
Maybe I am exaggerating, but I felt I had to say it.
So youāre concerned people who might aspire to be more like you are in danger of killing themselves? Seems a bit extreme to me, but better safe than sorry I suppose
Not exactly, I just wanted to make the point that some people might do things that are harmful to themselves (ranging from not having real friends or ignoring school/work to doing life threatening things) and it is right to think about it before giving advice.
Iāve already said that Iām not a good example, but maybe someone might think that with 100.000 games they are even more likely to become famous. And I canāt imagine a human being managing that many.
I meant 100.000 correspondence games at the same time, Iām sorry I was not clear.
Fun fact: I wanted to say 10.000 but in my opinion 10.000 can be done
(Please donāt take it as a challenge)
Sheās famous now!
Iām not sure itās a good idea to make jokes about the death of child.
Certainly not in a place where those who knew and loved her were likely to see it, but I think weāre sufficiently distant from it.
Of course itās a tragedy and perhaps even more tragic is this (from the linked article):
The suicidal game also took the life of a nine-year-old boy who heard about Antonella and decided to try it himself.
That sounds more like suicide than misadventure ā¦
You donāt know if some readers of this forum have lost a child or have been in a similar situation.