It seems to me the past decisions to:
- Grant ratings on 9x9 and 13x13 games
- Separate the ranks/ratings for Blitz, Timed and Correspondence
- Keep the old single rating separately from the three in #2
- Call the old single rating 'overall’
have complicated the matter, and made understanding of issues/
problems difficult.
It may be time for a coherent, high-level policy to be established/published, and all above four items to be re-evaluated based on this.
Everyone understands 9x9 Blitz and 19x19 Correspondence could have different characteristics. But the issues are multi-dimensional:
- Board size
- Game speed
- Tournament/Ladder/Other
- Multiple / Provisional accounts
- Sandbaggers/Airbaggers
- Human/Bots
and the Elo system, originally developed for Chess, does not cope well with such disparities without careful adaptations.
note: Sandbaggers are those who claims/maintains lower rank/rating than his/her true strength for the joy of destroying opponents in games. Airbaggers are those who tries to obtain higher rank/rating than his/her true strength taking advantage of loopholes in rating systems. ‘Airbagger’ term is quite new, might be unique to OGS, and may be a creation of an OGS user, Rikhon.