Yeah it’s completely bonkers
I had read that QR codes were inspired by Go, but I never really looked into how they are generated. It was interesting to see the similarities.
Go | QR codes | |
---|---|---|
playing area | comes in different grid sizes: 9x9, 13x13, 19x19, etc. | also comes in different sizes: 21x21, …, 177x177 |
opening | corners first | position and alignment patterns in the corners |
middle game | players begin to play towards the center | message gets encoded and occupies space on one side (expands towards the center) |
endgame | fill in dame | fill in error correction squares |
post-game | rearrange stones to make the score easier to count | flip some of the squares to make the QR code easier to scan |
This suggests the idea of using fake go games as an espionage means of transmitting information or instructions via QR codes.
Charts, data and marketing for a different game that is rising in popularity. Quite a lot of things to think about:
Yeah, the thumbnail is trolling the nay-sayers.
Good, because I never could get into watching WNBA until the first time I saw CC play. She’s a huge draw!
(and after watching the video I see I’m not alone)
That isn’t relaxing, is it?
But I guess it could be thought provoking.
I’m asking myself right now what went wrong with social entertainment.
Some days ago I was looking at this one.
(*)
Except for the presence of some interesting parts for my job, my question was the same: social entertainment is f###d up!
Oh, well, that’s not a question.
But that’s a thought anyway.
(*) It seems I can’t get to have a preview thumbnail
If I was in the same room as them it would not be relaxing, but I found the video light hearted. A nice combination of slap stick and informative that I found relaxing. Maybe not calming or soothing or tranquil… but relaxing seems fitting enough.
Oh no! Another minecraft gamer!
I think this is one of the best videos Veritasium made so far (although I readily admit that I’m biased, being more into physics than into maths or engineering):
It is a tantalising video. I wish it went deeper into the topic, but I suppose more research needs to be done first.
Dr Geoff Lindsey: my latest discovery in the youtube ocean. Only once mentioned before in this forum: I’m astonished!
Immediately followed by another discovery from the same day. Last Sunday I had a mildly annoying back ache and spent some hours on the bed.
This instrument combines my interest for smart gadgets and for microtonality. It’s mind blowing.
3Blue1Brown videos are pretty much great by default, but this is definitely one of those (especially if you’re a regular in nerdy cocktail parties, supposedly).
Thanks for the delightful video. The instrument sounds beautiful. As MB said, it sounds more like a guitar than a piano. I think this is because of the electronic rendering of the tone; there is no percusive quality that come from hammers hitting strings. I thought its use was much more effective in the blues tunes highlighted in the first half than in the more pop-like material of the second half. This may be because it better fits the note bending that we expect from blues. The pop melodies seemed a bit more uniform and bland.
I explored microtonality as a listener in college and after, mainly through Harry Partch, Ives, and the electronic music laboratory at my school, which gave recitals of original compositions (however, I pretty thoroughly disliked that electronic music, which was much more crude in nature). I did notice that in Partch, who used a 43-tone scale based on just intonation, there is a certain harmonic uniformity that can get boring. This is probably due to the problem of modulation using instruments with fixed tones (even though Partch built his own unique instruments).
I knew someone once who was literally tone deaf. He could not distinguish a semitone, which meant that music was little more than an incomprehensible blur of sound to him. Many more people cannot hear a quarter-tone, which makes microtonality similarly unhearable.