Questions Re "alt sandbagging" and provisional rank

Well, not if it’s 3 Dan Vs DDK :wink: I predict resignation on move 50 :rofl:

2 Likes

You assume DDK know when to resign >.<

That’s the reason I try to find players within 4 stones or so. Still easy win, but doesn’t drag on…

whoops didn’t mean to reply to Gennan’s comment. Sorry for any confusion!

3 Likes

In my older age and taking advice from my teacher, I’m not as aggressive as I used to be. Nowadays I prefer to play safe and be satisfied by winning slowly on territory. So I probably won’t win by move 50.

2 Likes

Haha! Yeah! There’s probably a meme for that: “Plays to counting. Loses by 100 points”

4 Likes

@gennan tip: check out the 3 highest ranked players who have 3 ongoing chlalnges for higher places, could sling you preyy high up ^^

5 Likes

Thanks for the tip!

I didn’t consider this, but OGS allows them to just cancel the game when it starts (which happened in one of those games).

Do you still move up the ladder if this happens?

Yes

1 Like

there is option to hide ranks of everyone
what if someone creates 1 [?] account not in order to play weaker players?
what if he always creates unranked challenge with no rank restriction?
Mission is to live in the world where rank completely not exists.
opponents should not assume that all [?] accounts are weak anyway, its their problem if they assume it.

Unranked games by definition cannot be sandbagging.

1 Like

This isn’t the problem either. The problem is people who make many [?] accounts to provide them with ranked games against DDK’s.