It’s not just a random decision, there’s data to support that it works (or worked) just as well or better than the individual ratings at predicting who would win in a matchup.
Now I think it can be fair to ask for another up to date analysis, or to suggest other methods of testing whether the overall rank works better than then individual. That seems reasonable to me.
I don’t think this is very accurate. It wouldn’t take much effort to get a 9x9 rank to match your 19x19 rank because they’re very similar games, they have very similar tactics, reading, life and death, endgame, tesuji. You’ll have to adjust things slightly for the board size sure, but the skill set is very similar.
Chess is not very like Go at all, and I’m pretty sure it would take a lot of effort for people to match their Go rating in Chess unless they weren’t that highly rated.