Adding a 3x3 to a 4x4 is in some way a bit uncommon, as there are usually better more ambituous,less conservative moves like a keima or a wide extension for example. Now a 3x4 is not that weird compared to a 3x3 as it protects the corner and offer better future connection on a side.
During the opening, the move is probably a bit slow. Generally if you want to play a combination of 2 stones in the corner, you’d prefer a normal shimari like (4-4 + 3-6), (3-4 + 5-3), etc.
The move may sometimes be correct at the end of middlegame, if it’s the last big point and you want to prevent the opponent from invading a big territory (assuming that combination + surrounding stones are enough to prevent an invasion).
It’s a reasonable move to totally prevent the 3-3 invasion. It’s not unreasonable as in not an overplay, if anything it’s an underplay because a bit slow and inefficient. Tewari argument : imagine you played the 3-4 first, and then wanted to add another move, 5-4 next for high shimari would generally be better than 4-4.
with an approach move there is more to investigate like the difference with answering at the 3.4 vs a diagonal-contact move on the approaching move, or a pincer…