(inb4, yes I know, don’t rub it in)
Around move 200 white started looking for a second eye for that middle group, was there a way to have that eye at the top left or was everything already lost?
2 Likes
Also, next person who corrects my grammar gets blocked. 
2 Likes
Can I use yebellz as a scapegoat?
2 Likes
Komi 337???
AfaIcantell that thing was dead way before move 200.
2 Likes
I don’t know… I’m sure I would’ve died there as well.
Off topic:
Is the original title really a mistake…? The current is correct if interpreted as “Could white have [created a second eye] and [lived]”, but what if the reading is “Could white [have created a second eye] and [live]”? The group being alive is not something that happens in the past, it would have still been ongoing, right?
On the other hand, I think English has a rule that past, present and future tenses cannot occur side to side in a conjunction.
2 Likes
@mark5000 I checked the variation, but I don’t see it. 
B16 would have given White an eye? That’s what I should have done?
B16 makes Black into an L group, which is killable. You might capture the upper left corner.
2 Likes
It doesn’t save the middle group, though, black can still cut it off
1 Like
I wonder if I could fork it to two 9d bots, see what they make of it, LOL
1 Like
Why am I a scapegoat?
1 Like
Because it seems like the sort of thing you’d do. 