If @Gia would like that, I see no problem with another extension
Thank you, but I am ready to attend the banquet.
Let’s see how welcoming everyone was and who moved in for the kill.
Maybe if you had control from the start of the game our nations could have lived peacefully side by side, but unfortunately your predecessor started the aggression from move 1
… Works in mysterious ways.
Perhaps, others are also ready to eat
End of Round 6
PiggyStardust and
martin3141 collided on their first choice, but both got to play their second choice. All other players played at their first choice.
Any player with no stones on the board is eliminated at the start of Round 7. Since all players enter round 7 with stones on the board, nobody is eliminated.
Player | 1st move |
2nd move |
---|---|---|
![]() |
M6 | |
![]() |
C5 | B3 |
![]() |
C5 | C2 |
![]() |
J8 | |
![]() |
D3 | |
![]() |
J7 | |
![]() |
G5 | |
![]() |
H6 |
Round 7
In order not to be eliminated at the start of next round, a player needs 1 or more stones on the board.
Round 7 starts with the following position.
Editable demo board
Please submit your next moves before 2020-10-16T20:00:00Z
Current number of stones per player:
Player | #stones | |
---|---|---|
![]() |
6 | |
![]() |
6 | |
![]() |
6 | |
![]() |
6 | |
![]() |
6 | |
![]() |
6 | |
![]() |
6 | |
![]() |
6 |
Welcome Gia!!!
I would like to found a Double Digit Kyute alliance. IIRC, at least two other players also fall into this category, right? Let’s be the underdogs everybody roots for! I’m 13k, 'fess up y’all
To quote Artaphernes’ remark to Histiaios: You made that shoe, but Aristagoras had to wear it.
24k atm.
Ive gone down recently from mostly random losing
25k, Eternal TPK.
around 10k, in reality probably less (or more?) because I won against dans in timeout.
I have mixed feelings about bringing up go ranks here, especially the thought of creating an alliance based on ranks. When discussing the more intricate details of the rules in a diplomatic game, yebellz wrote
Although I cannot completely prevent it, I am trying not to let factors outside the game influence my decisions, and go ranks fall into that category.
On the other hand I don’t want to be a fun killer, and I assume nobody can view the game in a completely isolated way anyway. I would rather not announce it publicly, but if you want to know my go rank, you can check on my OGS profile page.
I think it’s impossible to completely remove bias, but we should try.
Further, I think that Go skill is only a small part of Diplomatic Go skill. In fact, I think that negotiation and communication skills are far more important than the rest.
In the absence of a move submission from @Maharani, Round 7 will be extended 24 hours.
The new deadline is 2020-10-17T20:00:00Z.
Sorry y’all, real life got busy for a hot minute.
I’ll try to remain peaceful as long as possible. I’m playing at H5. (No rule against announcing my move here, right?)
Of course not! Depending on the situation, other players may use that information against you… but then you might also be bluffing. So there’s some interesting strategic uses of announcing moves.
End of Round 7
@martin3141 collided with their first move at C4 with a preexisting stone, and with their second move at D2 with the first stone placed by
@PiggyStardust, but succeeded in placing their third choice of E2. Other than that, all players succeeded in playing their first choice.
As the only group without liberties, @Sanonius’ group at D3 is removed from the board.
Any player with no stones on the board is eliminated at the start of Round 8. Since all players enter round 8 with stones on the board, nobody is eliminated.
Player | 1st move |
2nd move |
3rd move |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
N10 | ||
![]() |
D2 | ||
![]() |
C4 | D2 | E2 |
![]() |
K8 | ||
![]() |
L2 | ||
![]() |
K6 | ||
![]() |
G4 | ||
![]() |
H5 |
Round 8
In order not to be eliminated at the start of next round, a player needs 1 or more stones on the board.
Round 8 starts with the following position.
Please submit your next moves before 2020-10-18T20:00:00Z
Current number of stones per player:
Player | #stones | |
---|---|---|
![]() |
7 | |
![]() |
7 | |
![]() |
7 | |
![]() |
7 | |
![]() |
3 | |
![]() |
7 | |
![]() |
7 | |
![]() |
7 |
Exciting with such an early big capture! If we had gone with the original N/2-rule I proposed, pink would already be eliminated here. I think this is a good argument for N/2 - 3 being better, since pink still has a promising position in the lower right.
Hm, isn’t the requirement for next round still only 1 stone? (8/2 - 3 = 1)