I used an AI to make paintings using only the terms “Baduk” and “Weiqi.” Thoughts?

I don’t see why chat gpt always include those black and white :white_large_square::black_large_square: squares, besides some confusion with some other strategic games. Shameful :trident:

6 Likes

chat gpt only generates the text, it doesn’t draw the picture
dalle 3 do, and its weak old model already now

4 Likes


surprisingly high quality game position

9 Likes

Not bad for a 5 stones handicap game on 11x11 board! :smile:

3 Likes

It must be pair go. The dragon couple appear to both be playing white, so the stalks must be playing black :sweat_smile:

3 Likes

Not sure I would have wasted 3 stones in the top left corner though :sweat_smile:

1 Like

11x12, but I won’t judge them for playing crazy board variants.

3 Likes

Hand is trying to get Go stone from Go bowl. Cat paw very fiercely defends the stone with exposed claws.

8 Likes

Here is the true capacity of the Image3.0 generating Go board position. It’s improving a lot, but had to try quite a few times, and often with artifacts on stones or the board (and very limited and specific art styles repeatedly). And often when it gets the board size right, the stone wrong, or the stone right, but the size wrong. (Ideogram-v2, and recraft-v3 sometimes would get good enough images that players would be able to recognize the “attempt”, but many details are very wrong, not just the positions, but like stones not on the grids, not the right colors, or even strange spacing for the lines and the board itself). And using the keyword weiqi or baduk is very crucial, using the phrase “the game of Go”, the success rate of generating good images would drop significantly.

prompt: A poster with encouraging phrases related to weiqi, showing a diagram of a 9 by 9 board of the game of weiqi in the center with artwork surrounding it

Good one (and peek into the inner workings of the model with some kind of symmetry)

Slightly off, (and quite off for those in the background)

Very wrong

Just weird

Repeated style but wrong in many ways

Relatively good one (can photoshop out the artifcats, but not on 9x9 for some reason)

I’d say 1 out of 3 or 4, I can get a good enough output that can use photoshops to produce a poster that is somewhat usable for outsiders (who don’t know about board positions and realize they are just nonsense)

3 Likes

Replacing the board position with a real one should be easy, if you use Photoshop (or GIMP etc.) anyway.

For some, maybe, but sometimes the “surrounding artworks” would intrude the center, and often with questionable quality that is purely nonsense words or the background includes boards which are also off (and defeat the purpose of photoshopping the centerpiece).

1 Like