I want a manual score estimator

I’m not sure if anyone has suggested this, but I’ve searched and haven’t seen anything similar.

I hope to have a purely manual score estimator, which should have the following features and functions:

  1. Assume that all stones are alive. (Does not automatically identify life and death)
  2. Assume that all points are neutral unless the space is closed by the same color. (Like when checking scores)
  3. Manually click on the stone group to change its life and death.
  4. Manually mark the color of the points.
  5. Based on life and death and the color of the points, it shows who wins by how many points, how many points black has, how many points white has, and how many neutral points are left.
  6. Record the manual click life and death and mark color. The estimated score of the next click does not need to be clicked and marked again.

That’s all.
I don’t need those stupid automatic recognition and automatic marking, I want to manually mark life, death and territory myself.
To be precise, what I want may be a “score calculator” or a “score counter”.
I don’t need it to “estimate” for me.
Since it doesn’t involve any Go skills and AI, it should also work with analysis disabled.

I know counting is not difficult, you just need to be patient and take your time.
If playing live games, this is no problem at all.

But I play correspondence games, I have hundreds of games like this:


I can definitely count them myself, but I’m sure I won’t remember them at all tomorrow because there are hundreds of games.
If every time it’s my turn to move, I have to manually count dozens or hundreds of points to determine whose land is larger, which is a huge waste of time.
Remember, there are hundreds of games like this.

Existing score estimators are simply not useful in this case.
I think it’s too nosy and I don’t need it to judge possible intrusions.
I just want it to show who has the bigger territory the way I want it to.

2 Likes

So count them yourself, and write the results in the private game notes so you don’t need to do it again next move. That’s what I did when I played correspondence and wanted to play good endgame. I would also write down the sizes of endgame moves I calculated.

1 Like

Yes, particularly when you’re playing out an alternate endgame, and the game is finished, you don’t want to see W+0.0 or B+7.0 even when it isn’t integer komi.

We have about half of what your asking for at the moment

You can basically manually mark the board, points and dead stones stones with the X. I think the calculator tool does actually auto mark enclosed regions, but I don’t think it actually shows the score anywhere, unless anyone knows? @anoek

3 Likes

I went to test it out and it’s great, it’s actually half done.

But color should not be allowed to be marked on live groups, since dead groups can be made transparent using an X.

In addition to missing the score count, it also lacks a memory function, which I wish it could remember marked colors and life and death.

2 Likes

Nope, it’s in the todo list though

Noted

6 Likes