It will not accept that in Japanese rules A9 should not give black any point
3 Likes
interface or opponent?
1 Like
Well, technically the opponent I guess, but itās because heās insisting on following the āauto-scoreā so itās also the interface.
2 Likes
opponent who donāt understand Japanese seki:
āi have blocked u from future games. cheaterā
3 Likes
Upon further research online I believe this would be scored the same way in any other ruleset too. In Chinese rules Seki gives the side with eyes points. However this is a false eye, so even in Chinese rules there will be no points here.
black can place stone here and nothing will change
this is a point in Chinese rules
2 Likes
Oh damn. I guess youāre right.
I believe you can shift click individual points to toggle them as territory or not, which is useful for correcting seki or manually scoring seki. (On desktop at least)
2 Likes
I understand that but you see here how people will insist on following the auto score. Is it hard to fix this issue?
Itās not something Iāve tried myself so I donāt really know. Still itās worth knowing how to correct the score for the odd time the autoscore fails ( can happen with server issues sometimes)
Some people have played around with editing the scoring code I think, and there were some proposals also to override Katagoās suggestions in cases where stones were in atari or could be captured in a couple of moves etc so as not to give players hints or ideas in the scoring phase they might not have know about.
So in theory there someone might be able to fix it along with other things, Iām just not sure when.
2 Likes
There are several topics in the forums about this issue.
A post of mine from 1 month ago in another thread:
2 Likes
The OGS system automatically provides a preliminary scoring of the game, so the players donāt have to count every point every game.
** The preliminary scoring is not the final score. Players have to agree on life and death status of stones.
1 Like