Josekle #42 (9 moves)
Fusekle #24 (8 moves)
Josekle #43 (7 moves, one color)
Josekle #43 (11 moves, one color, hard)
By the way are do you keep any global stats for these or is this purely client-only with no server/db?
It’s just served via GitHub, so there’s no dedicated server. Maybe GitHub offers some traffic insights, but I don’t know about that.
1 Like
I see that it’s on github, but frontend being hosted there doesn’t prevent it from querying a server, so it depends on the implementation. Though I guess I could just read the sources.
It’s entirely static html and javascript, no backend server component. I’m not aware of any stats provided by github for pages, I think you have to add your own tracker, which we haven’t done
2 Likes
Josekle #44 (6 moves, one color)
Josekle #44 (15 moves, one color, hard)
Bug report:
Today's (normal mode) Josekle is again
not a complete joseki.
Technical issue: The sequence reverts to another joseki and thus it is cut off in the OJE and only linked to that other joseki via a comment. That seems to be the reason, why it is falsely recognized as complete by Josekle.
Possible solution: It shouldn’t be too hard to write some code to detect duplicate board positions. Then possible moves from equal positions could be used to extend those sequences that are cut off.
1 Like
See similar issue described before.
1 Like
That linked node is marked “Joseki Done” but the sibling position is not. Bug or bad data in OJE imho?
I guess we can investigate working around this kind of thing, but I won’t have time until after WSC
2 Likes
My guess is that it is tagged as “Joseki: Done” on purpose somehow, because OJE #20887 has that tag too.
1 Like
Josekle #45 (9 moves, one color)
Josekle #45 (18 moves, one color, hard)
I think it’s a huge oversight that “transposed positions” aren’t natively supported and instead need to be specified as a comment to the position. I think it needs to be made a field in a position’s data with the array of possible transpositions, filled manually as it is now.
1 Like
I think you’re talking about OGS Joseki Explorer here right, not Josekle? if so I agree although I don’t know anything about the OJE architecture and database etc. I don’t even have contributor access to add or comment on OJE. Probably suggestions about OJE would be worthy of its own thread, so the OGS devs can see it. OJE is certainly a great resource that could be improved even more
we did have support for transposed positions in the first version of the game but it posed challenges for rendering hints on the board so was removed
1 Like
Fusekle #27 (7 moves)
Y’all this was my first perfect Fusekle!!! Playing one opening over and over on Goquest finally paid off 
5 Likes
Josekle #46 (7 moves, one color)
Josekle #46 (12 moves, one color, hard)
Josekle #47 (8 moves)
Fusekle #29 (7 moves)
Josekle #48 (8 moves, one color)
Josekle #48 (6 moves, one color, hard)
Fusekle #34 (8 moves)
Look at all this purple.
Fusekle #34 (8 moves)
But,
Josekle #52 (6 moves, one color)
2 Likes
Josekle #53 (6 moves)
I suppose that’s the difference between one color mode and normal mode 
.
But I did okay in the end:
2 Likes