Edit: I misread something. Disregard. (post below kept intact merely for reply context)
Thatâs a patently bad idea. Youâre incentivizing live analysis against the preferences of most players (according to the admittedly non-random forum sample).
with my idea most games will have no analysis and anyone can do it so that they never encounter game with analysis. But those who like analysis will not suffer.
Poll was about default , not about forced
(answer for previous version of post above)
What you mean by âbadâ? You wish to those who like analysis to suffer?
I was aware that itâs about the default. Currently 71% for OFF.
But yes, a âno preferenceâ option would apparently increase the potential player pool for OFF by ~14% and the potential ON player pool by a whopping 50%. Doesnât sound so bad.
@anoek, please address this, itâs pretty farcical now. If all the time people have been spent talking about this on various forums had instead been spent working a minimum wage job and donating the proceeds to OGS, youâd probably have received more money than subscriptions in a year.