As a comment on the “See also” feature, I wonder would some manual tagging work better, or rather than manual tagging, only referencing the source or end nodes of a position that matches with the current sequence to cut down the number of entries a bit in the lists.
I mentioned here that it might not be that useful to have 19000 things in a list that you can scroll sideways through, so maybe to expand on what I mean:
- source nodes: I mean the earliest position where the current stone placements match. So for example this position
it might show only links to both
and
but no later continuations of the positions/joseki. The reason it would be these two for example, is because in these joseki, the previous moves remove the O17 and O18 stones which are stones 4,5 in the first position.
- end nodes: I mean the final positions of joseki where the stones are used. Now that would include both
from before, because it ends here and links to another move order to get the continuations.
It might also link to
and
among other things, depending on whether one filters by stuff like “Joseki:done” or not.