"Our systems have detected that you have been using AI assistance"? 😅

[Chinitsu]

I came online today and found this:

Pretty interesting, how did the system find out that I’m just pretending to know what I’m doing? I thought I hid it pretty well so far

(This is more or less a /joke thread. I’m neither for nor against this system as long as harsh punishment like suspension mentioned here is finally decided by human)

[Eugene]

@Chinitsu

I’m neither for nor against this system as long as harsh punishment like suspension mentioned here is finally decided by human

That is the case.

[xela]

I really think you need to change the wording of that message. Right now, it gives the impression that you think the automated system is perfect and that people’s accounts could be suspended automatically without any human review.

Surely there will be the occasional false positive. The wording of the message should admit that this is possible; otherwise I can imagine some innocent users feeling shocked and offended. My suggestion:

Our systems have detected that you may be using AI assistance in some of your games.

(second and third paragraphs don’t need to change)

If there is any further evidence of AI use, a moderator will review this case, and your account may be suspended.

[Atorrante]

@xela

further evidence of AI use

@xela

you may be using AI assistance

Aren’t further and may contradicting each other?
Better leave out further I think.

[jlt]

Or “further detection by our systems”?

[xela]

@Atorrante

Aren’t further and may contradicting each other?

Evidence and proof are two different things, so no, I don’t see it as a contradiction. “Our systems have detected…” is a piece of evidence, but not enough on its own for a definite conclusion. But I have no problem with a slightly different wording.

[Samraku]

@xela

Our systems have detected…

This does not come off as evidence, but as a definite finding

[Eugene]

Can I first say that I’m personally delighted to be reviewing the messages here in the forum.

These are “our” messages in a significant way. Moderation works much better when the community is comfortable with the way its done - especially the messaging, and especially now that more and more messaging is semi automated and/or canned.

I am totally in favour of adding the word “may”.

I think it is trying to say that our systems have detected something. What the have detected is that you may have been using AI.

The third sentence is in line with this: it’s not saying that there are games, it’s just asking you to resign from them if there are, and refrain from it.

I agree that “further use” is not in line with this. We could do with a better closing sentence that somehow conveys that should the person be found to be using AI beyond reasonable doubt, then they’ve aleady had a warning, so don’t expect another warning. That is what it is trying to say.