Life is messy
Tournament is finished.
I’ll throw some numbers in.
Recap of number of games for each round and handicap given:
We were interested in ranks/handicap system effectiveness.
I excluded all games ended by timeout, in order to have a cleaner dataset. Spoiler: it didn’t make much difference.
Round 1 without timeouts
Old rating system.
Small handicaps.
Outcome was quite even between white and black.
I don’t pay much attention to those 5 games with 2 stones handicap.
Also breaking handicaps (above) according to “supposed” rank difference (below) shows a very even result:
Round 2 without timeouts
Still old rating system.
Same as before: even games are perfectly fifty/fifty.
One stone games are pretty even.
Two stone games are won mostly by black.
I don’t mint those 4 games with 3 stones.
This looks also pretty even:
Round 3 without timeouts
New rating system.
Bigger handicaps.
Even are even.
1 stone won mostly by white
2 stones won mostly by black
3 stones almost all won by black, but not so many games
4 stones, just 3 games, nevermind
All in all, handicap system worked quite well.
Overall outcome is quite balanced.
Perhaps black has some advantage with bigger handicaps.
I’ll stick with that.
Thank you everybody.
Thanks for your analysis!
So, there were only two games won by White against 3 stones handicap, one in round 2 and one in round 3.
Here they are:
That’s good to know!
So under the new system, 19 out of 20 games with 3 or 4 stones were won by Black? That seems significant.
We could check this one. Although in round robin the results are somewhat dependent on each other (like if a player is underrated in one game, they’re underrated in others).
Yes, it seems, but when you look at each pool they are very few games and I don’t know how much they could actually be significant.
When I see (from my last histogram chart) 77 games with balanced outcome I feel much more confident respect to when I see 8 games with 7 black wins.
Here you are.
Only 105 games. 18 timeouts.
Handicaps from 0 to 5.
Excluding timeouts:
This still looks quite balanced to me.