Technically, you did… You were just quoting someone else
and unfortunately quoting quotes in here doesn’t work so well ![]()
It was actually @benjito that said that (in another thread) and it appeared inside of @Eugene’s post as a quote. I noticed that when one tries to quote quoted text (by selecting it and clicking quote) the discourse system seems to get confused and misattributes it.
Another example
But, did you…? ![]()
No, “technically” I did not. Nitpickingly, one could argue that these words were in my typing, but it is a ridiculous proposition to assert that I “said” it.
Forum quirks are no excuse for misquoting: you just edit the quote markup to be correct.
This is an example where it utterly doesn’t matter in the specific case - no-one could care less what my opinion about emacs is - but things can go pear shaped where people are misquoted, so I don’t like to let that pass as a matter of course.
I’m sorry about that - I tried my hand at the automatic quoting system and did not notice the result was misleading. I edited my post to remove the confusion.
Woo hoo another quoting-capable person joins the fold! A text-editor skill if ever there was one 
Must be a Vim user ![]()
I just realised what my favourite text editor is: discourse! 
It’s nice here… I’m also quite partial to GitHub’s setup as well ![]()
I, for whatever reason, always confuse discourse and discord. It took me far too long to figure out why you said that ![]()
So many
today
I might have to hang up my keyboard !
That one was on me though, not you ![]()

I also really like this forum software. It’s a probably a big reason of why I wound up spending so much more time here than r/baduk and L19x19.
However, although I came for the superior forum software, I stayed for the great community.
I learned emacs starting in '89 (pre vim’s existence). I’ve tried others since, but my fingers and brain and the suitcase full of elisp functions and macros I carry around are pretty much set in stone.
vi started '76 (like Emacs)
Do i hear some bragging here?
^_____^
No. Emacs ist '76 as well.