I said I didn’t want to argue more on this because I feel this subject is too sensitive but @Cchristina quoted me so I will add a few words. The study about Scrabble is here Gender differences in SCRABBLE performance and associated engagement in purposeful practice activities | SpringerLink you can read it and make your opinion. I understood that, given some amount of time dedicated to Scrabble, men and women spend that time differently, despite the fact that there are more women playing Scrabble than men.
Additional remarks about the current discussion:
The population is divided in two groups A and B. People in A are discriminated and underrepresented in some domain. Someone asks “why is the A group underrepresented?”. Reasons may be
C: discriminations/unfriendly environment created by B
D: other reasons.
The group B is divided into
B1: people who discriminate/harass/whatever people in group A
B2: people who don’t discriminate but don’t care or are not aware of discriminations
B3: people who are aware and care about the discrimination problem.
@Gia apparently says that we shouldn’t talk about D at all, because this distracts people from thinking about C which is the main problem and comforts the attitude of people in groups B1 and B2. I understand that point of view, however I am afraid that this can be counterproductive. People in group B1 will react by saying that the discussion is biased since not all aspects of the problem are discussed, and this will just comfort them in their opinions.