Hi everybody,
if you have some advice to give for a go player about books, could you tell us 5 books to buy for :
- a newbie (30- 15 kyu).
- an amateur (14- 5 kyu).
- a good player ( 4 kyu and more) ?
Thank you and happy new year.
Hi everybody,
if you have some advice to give for a go player about books, could you tell us 5 books to buy for :
Thank you and happy new year.
Hello @Yunzi (is that you? ā nice to āseeā you here, too )
Hard for me to answer, because ā¦
BUT here is what I recommend:
And then I can recommend ALL books by Robert Jasiek that Iām reading in:
Iād say these latter books are good to read from perhaps 22k on (up to perhaps 5k or even higher?)
I believe Jasiekās books have contributed to my ascent from perhaps 17k on. You might think thatās not a lot since now Iām between 13k and 11k, but I have been spending far too little time on Go study and play, and things like that Iād intermittently beaten a 6k and a 2k in correspondence games, and just recently a 4d in a 9x9 game, didnāt happen before, Iām QUITE sure all this would never have happened without the clearly structured and defined principles I learned from Jasiekās books.
Hi Thomas,
yes I am here also.
Thank you for your answer. Maybe someone else could be have some advices.
Hey, happy new year.
I consider these books to be the best for each level:
Newbie: Baduktopia - āLevel Up!ā Series 1-6
Amateur: Robert Jasiek - First Fundamentals (And generally everything by Robert Jasiek)
Good Amateur: No idea, Iām not there yet
Donāt believe a word of this, @Yunzi @FranƧisa is a very polite and modest person AND one of the very promising SDK players here who will probably soon be Shodan.
Newbie: "Lessons in the Fundamentals of Go"
Amateur: āMaking Good Shapeā, āAttack and Defenseā, "Direction of Play"
Good Player: you know what youāre missing, probably have you read Empty Triangle, Ajiās Quest, seen Hikaru no Go?
newbie must read is āOpening Theory Made Easyā by otake hideo
While I like that book a LOT, Iām not sure it would make sense to read it before reaching about 20k.
I havenāt looked at and compared enough books to really say that these are better than other options, but here is what I read and found very helpful and suitable for the skills levels that you described.
Newbie: āLearn to Play Goā series by Janice Kim
Amateur: āElementary Go Seriesā by several authors
Good Player: not qualified to answer
I would not recommend Lessons in the fundamentals of go to newbies. Iād say itās more for 20k player or stronger.
Iām just a (bad) amateur and never read books before turning SDK on KGS (the contrary would probably have saved me a lot of time), so I can only give an opinion on āamateur levelā books, and I liked In the beginning a lot. I have yet to read Attack and defense, on which I heard only good comments.
I have a friend who picked up āLessons in the Fundamentalsā for his first Go book as a complete beginner and liked it.
Yes, it does contain some advanced content. The real value of the book lies in the writing and presentation of the material. It is funny, memorable and motivating and will excite you about the game, even if you donāt understand everything
On a side note, I am a bit irritated about the phrase ā20k or strongerā. What does that mean?
20k is where most rating systems set their weakest rank, as a ridiculous statement about the ālongā way these players have to go to SDK. Apparently, this was not enough for the authors of the original OGS, leading to the introduction of even lower ranks. Predictably, this continues to drag down all OGS ranks to this day.
I have even heard (in real life) statements like āIām just a beginner, probably still around 50kā. Where does that come from? Maybe itās a result of some self-deprecation hysteria that befalls newbies when they first get trashed by a regular player. Maybe theyāre trying desperately not to sound arrogant and over-ambitious.
Itās ridiculous! I canāt win against those players with a 49 stone handicap. I highly doubt I could give 19 stones to most of the [20k] around here either.
Under any sensible rating system, a 20k player is someone who understands the basic rules, like when to take stones off the board, and that it is sometimes not ok to capture ko, but snapback is fine (once you point out that itās there).
I entered my first tournament as 16k after a small handful of games. The tournament on its own taught me more than those initial games. I am not exactly a fast learner, especially compared to the 1-year-shodans.
OGS is the odd exception. It alienates me
I donāt get it. If one starts to play on ogs, one takes the ranks for granted and tracks the progess without being alienated. If you started to play somewhere else, you just know that your rank here corresponds to that rank there somewhere else.
My experience is that places where people say āYou are a beginner, so somewhere between 20k-15k, exact ranks do not mean anything in that range.ā are places where you have to get to 13k to be assigned opponents of similar skill at tournaments.
It seriously sucks to play against āother 18k playersā and they are all either 4 stones better or 4 stones worse.
Another issue is that there is no reason whatsoever that handicap stones should be transitive.
The fact that you cannot give 49 stones to someone does not prove that there is not a chain of 50 people from you to this person where everyone has to give one stone. I think that this strange assumption is responsible for a large part of the weird behaviour of the ranking systems.
Letās stay on topic here folks.
I have not read many go books, but I can definitely vouch for the Elementary Go Series, particularly Attack and Defense. These books helped me get from DDK to SDK and I still have a lot to learn from them, so I plan to reread them many times. Some people say the joseki book in the series is outdated, but for an amateur I think it still has a lot of relevant content.