Did you actually say an oath in yours?
I think we did, but itâs been too many years to remember clearly.
1 Like
Yes, I think there are a couple of standards ones for the occassion. Not really the kind of formal Hippocratic oath for doctors, but a generally scientific one about truth, integrity and stuff, if I remember correctly.
2 Likes
Older people seem to enjoy it because they are proud for the âyounger generationâ or because they didnât make it to high school.
Younger people seem to avoid ceremonies, unless there is a party afterwards and they can dress accordingly.
Family is different, we are there for the popcorn 
I think there is always an oath, but in some cases (my Uni) itâs read aloud with great fanfare by the top graduate and everybody else is thinking about what to order for food, if they switched off the water heater and if they can rearrange their toes in their shoes without all the photographers immortalizing the moment.
2 Likes
The first one I missed due to travel, so I picked up the hardcopy on a random Tuesday. The second one was cancelled due to Corona, and I had to do an extraordinary amount of work to receive my diploma (as I have documented somewhere on the forum before, I think) so I could apply for my PhD⊠
I suppose my PhD may or may not have a ceremony attached, although it might happen digitally, with people not wanting to travel anymore.
Amateur astronomers first pointed the finger at SpaceX, but then recalculated that it was likely to be from a 2014 Chinese lunar mission (Changâe 5-T1). China has contested this, saying that the booster in question had âsafely entered the Earthâs atmosphere and was completely incineratedâ.
A mystery rocket has crashed into the Moon, creating a large double crater
At least 47 Nasa rocket bodies have created âspacecraft impactsâ on the Moon, according to 2016 data from Arizona State University.
However, âno other rocket body impacts on the Moon created double craters,â said Nasa.
2 Likes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Hunga_Tonga%E2%80%93Hunga_Ha%27apai_eruption_and_tsunami
In the Volcanic Explosivity Index scale, the eruption was rated at least a VEI-5.[1]
It was the largest volcanic eruption since the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-61567521
Researchers have just finished mapping the mouth of the underwater Tongan volcano that, on 15 January, produced Earthâs biggest atmospheric explosion in over a century.
The caldera of Hunga-Tonga Hunga-Haâapai is now 4km (2.5 miles) wide and drops to a base 850m below sea level.
4 Likes
Could be true there, but there sure are no âgender reveals, post-wedding, divorce parties or promposalsâ here 
Remember, all that is good business and cost A LOT of money, so it makes sense of marketing to push for all those new âcelebrationsâ ⊠I mean you cannot sustain a whole industry just with marriages, especially now that they are on the decline.
2 Likes
Yeah, if I understand correctly thatâs military departments in universities. You donât have to serve after that you go into reserve right after. It was a legitimate way to dodge the conscription. You waste time out of army to not waste time in the army. I considered it and even did something for it but then like nah, maybe because I donât like physical exercise. They were required to pass some time in the fields so while everyone was preparing their final university works they lied in a ditch somewhere. Probably right call not to go, honestly, with all the instability in the world, you donât wanna look like a trained soldier ready to be sent somewhere.
This way to dodge was changed recently though. Iâm not entirely sure how itâs all in practice but on the internet they write that you have to sign contract with the military after officer training for 3 or 5 years. Which means shooting people in some foreign countries. It seems you can refuse but you need to pay back money spent on you or something, and you can be unfit for military after all, and I heard that thereâre programs where you donât need to sign contract too⊠Lots of annoying details.
But even if you dodge that, country doesnât train you for fun. And weâre warring nation, motherland might need our skills at some point. Screw that. Better play dumb.
3 Likes
It is a very nice idea, but as you said it seems to be a bit complex in its implementation. At the end of the day if you cannot really avoid getting drafted (via some loophole or legitimate reason) and you have to spend some mandatory time of your life in the army, Iâd say that picking whichever officer program each country might have is always something worth considering for four reasons that are valid in any such system:
a) If you are going to spend time there anyway, why not learn and experience the most they can teach and offer, instead of wasting time just guarding empty fields and buildings? Any path that offers up âmore knowledgeâ is worth at least considering.
b) You will come out of whatever training program they have with a rank that is higher than the âsergeant typeâ ⊠outranking those people is a huge and underrated plus.
c) Unlike soldiers who are usually lumped into the âinfantryâ category en masse, reserve officers usually get a much higher chance to be assigned in various support corps.
d) If, at any point, the worst comes to pass and the country does need to re-draft the reserves, the re-draft has two rules/ideas ⊠âyounger and more recently trained firstâ and âsoldiers and low ranks firstâ ⊠just by entering the reserves as an officer does not only put you in a better position on how dangerous any sort of deployment might be, but it also puts you in a better position in the fact that they might not call you to serve at all., if your type of corps/training is not deemed to be needing re-inforcements (if you get re-drafted as an officer, you get paid as one 
⊠noone wants that ⊠soldiers are much cheaper).
Well, here in the Balkans there are similar ⊠historical tendencies.
As far as I am concerned, just being able to listen to the yearly dance of news about âimminent warâ and all those scare tactics and actually knowing what on earth is really going on, was worth it all the trouble I went through.
Also, having three stars and the rank of Captain in a support corps, instead of being just âanother infantry soldierâ, ainât nothing to sneeze at either
You can be dumb and an officer ⊠in some posts it is actually required ahahah
On 2022 news for those interested in legal explanations and intricacies and rummifications:
Thereâs a saying, not entirely sure how do you say it though. The law is like a horse. It goes wherever you turn it.
To be fair, if only 55% are pro-choice maybe this shouldnât be a right then. What kind of right is that if half the country is against it. And thatâs record high since 1995? Itâs somehow good result then? I wonder what happened in 1995.
2 Likes
I guess they are stuck with it now, but who designs a poll like this and thinks it would be a good idea to use âunder anyâ for one side and âin allâ for the other?
6 Likes
Do I understand correctly that
- pro-life activists generally think that abortion should be illegal in all circumstances
- pro-choice activists generally think that abortion should be legal under any circumstances
- those who think that abortion should be legal only under certain circumstances are classified as âpro-lifeâ?
I can just shake my head about âcertain circumstancesâ. People choosing that option might think that abortion should only be allowed if there are life-threatening circumstances for the mother after incestual rape within the first 4 weeks of pregnancy. Or they might think that it should be allowed in the first 8 months only, no other questions asked. These two people are registered as having basically the same opinion!
5 Likes
Also, I know we disagree about this a lot, but not all opinions are created equal.
Also also, men who disagree should get vasectomies pronto and then weâll talk.
I guess it was funny back then before DNA tests when lords could claim their underage servants were just promiscuous and deny fathering children here and there without consent.
3 Likes
I donât really understand the logic in those two sentences. Could you explain? If 45% of the population states that they donât want anyone to have a choice, then you think no one should have a choice?
What does âwhat kind of right is thatâ mean? A right is a right. It means a woman can freely walk into an aborting clinic and have an abortion, regardless of whether 45% of the population think she shouldnât have that choice.
1 Like
Note that only 39% of the US population is âpro-lifeâ. I guess 6% of the population doesnât have an opinion.
1 Like
The terms âpro-choiceâ and âpro-lifeâ say more than the polls themselves.
2 Likes
I think the comparison that should be made in order to understand the issue, is that the pro-choice group finds it more important to allow women the choice to abort a pregnancy and decide their own life, than to continue the (potential) life of the unborn fetus. On the other hand, the pro-life group finds the perceived ending of the life of the unborn fetus to be so amoral that abortion should be prohibited, even though it means many women have to suffer through an unwanted pregnancy and most likely the raising of a new child.
These are essentially incomparable viewpoints, since one is about the right to control your own life while the other is about preventing murder. However, the first group doesnât see it as murder, and the second group canât see how body-autonomy can be important enough to condone murder.
What I find strange, is that many of the same people who tend to be against abortion, have little issue with the gigantic loss of life due to gun violence, or climate change, and even condone death penalties, which is quite clearly just a form of murder.
7 Likes