A Semantic Game

Sometimes I wonder if Haze is from this world. He’s like the Beret Guy from xkcd.

Good night, gang o/

1 Like

I need to go for a while. I’ll leave the game in your capable hands :slightly_smiling_face:

I propose a new rule, if I win I’ll make it effective.
Every player has the right to summon @RubyMineshaft to give us a new rule. If he refuses or doesn’t respond in three posts (without counting the summoner’s post) the summoner loses.

4 Likes

Who is this person?

1 Like

Currently being thankful that one doesn’t necessarily lose when one don’t win.

PiggyStardust is great!

Every player has the right to summon @RubyMineshaft to give us a new rule. If he refuses or doesn’t respond in three posts (without counting the summoner’s post), the summoner loses.

@RubyMineshaft give us a new rule please!

1 Like

No rule for you. Push ups please :smiling_imp:

6 Likes

On it…

1…2…3…4…5…

6 Likes

But I suspect anyone who summons me will have push-ups in their future because of rule no. 4.

1 Like

I propose rule 11 if I win:

Rule 4 does not apply to @RubyMineshaft

5 Likes

Unless someone makes a new rule according to which rule 4 doesn’t apply to rule 10.

Edit: right @Vsotvep.

PiggyStardust is great!

Rule 4 does not apply to @RubyMineshaft

@discobot fortune

:crystal_ball: It is certain

2 Likes

Maybe discobot can quote a new rule.

@discobot quote.

Hi! To find out what I can do, say @discobot display help.

@ discobot quote

Unfortunately, I can’t make discobot fulfill the condition on winning.

I think we need to make rules that move the game forward to avoid getting stuck. Maybe there are some rules we could amend. I think we need other methods of winning

2 Likes

Sup yall I just feel like posting but it doesn’t seem like much happened while I was gone.

@RubyMineshaft come cause why not

2 Likes