Did you try https://golens.org/ ?
What’s your opinion on this tool?
2 Likes
What’s your opinion on this tool?
What’s your opinion on this tool?
Answer me first
no u
3 Likes
I tested with very old games so I dunno. I would like some people test it with better knowledge of their own games
2 Likes
I had troubles understanding the focus points, not sure how to “practice midgame decisions, especially when facing execution mistake situations”
But its still really nice it can provide some tips and give me links to lectures and senseis articles. The heatmap is also pretty fun, seems like i make way more mistakes on the bottom side of the board than on all other areas, i wonder if i have some weird mental issue making me see the bottom as “less important” than the other parts of the board?
And all tools which can help people to improve their go are awesome additions overall ^___^
2 Likes
The author said it’s made by a self made player for the self made player.
I stay still quite in doubt with what AI could generate as advices and teaching, but at the same time quite curious about the attempts to extracts some content from the moves evaluation, this by our new go players génération, beyond the classics.
2 Likes
Ah and one thing i really like that tool, is that one of its suggested resources is Go Proverbs at Sensei's Library
I’ve long envisioned a tool which could point out mistakes and explain those using proverbs, that would be actually super helpful. Having kata tell that “R12 was -8.6, Q17 is blue” isn’t very helpful, but if it would be combined with some suitable proverb like “make territory while attacking”, then i could see it being great learning tool
2 Likes
Was it really correlated? If so, that’s awesome ( I mean something not similar as using discobot)
Lol, it suggested me to watch Dwyrin’s “back to basics”.
4 Likes
I recognize your style 
One of the issues is that it doesn’t recognize handicap game, and keeps pointing out that the biggest move is to play at the handicap stone position.
1 Like
I average 9.8 blunders per game, though I won 8 out of the 10 (all even or no-komi games, currently 2.2 dan)
Actually I’m not sure why N14 is dark red on my heatmap, I don’t open there.
hmm…
Hey all!
I’m the author of the tool 
so cool to see that there’s a dedicated page on this forum, thanks for noticing it and talking about it!
There is still work to be done, particularly:
- fixing silly bugs (such as the one Counting_Zenist pointed out - issues with handicap stones games)
- working on perfecting the classification algorithm
- fixing the resources a little, as now they seem to be a bit over the place (I tried my best, there is a lot of stuff out there lol)
It is very much WIP so really, any feedback is much appreciated!
4 Likes
Hi welcome to the OGS forum!
I’m mostly interested in the pertinence of the teaching/advising and it’s usefulness.
These days there are more and more authors assuming they will publish some analytics thanks to using proper LLMs to teach the AIs to answer in a useful way. Promises only till now.
I keep being interested in what could come finally some day with some real efficient teaching
Can we teach an AI concepts like miai, thickness, proper timing, haengma, sabaki, moyo, yosumiru, sacrifice, aji, etc etc…? Till now I’m not even sure someone reach to teach cut and connect.
Ok let see how players enjoy the new comer and congratulations anyway for your effort
1 Like
Leaderboard is wrong because games with just 1 stone on the board are included.
If there are no stones, there are no blunders, top place.
Instead of sorting by Avg blunders / game, its better to sort by number of blunders / number of moves
1 Like
Good point! I did notice that some player at the top of the leaderboard are a little off, I was thinking of a solution and I think you hit the nail on the head! Will work on fixing tomorrow Thanks for the great suggestion 
Thats a great question! I do think AI is far from understanding the game of go, and as a matter of fact I do use katago to analyze the game but I don’t use another AI layer, what I mean is that I take the numbers that katago gives back and I infer the meaning of those numbers, without AI
LLMs are not cutting it for such a task. And yes, a teacher is still on another level, and this tool I made is not meant to replace a teacher at all! Rathed to give you a better overview of your tendencies
So I guess what I mean to say is that I agree with you, and I really don’t have the presumption to say that I created a tool that replaces Go teachers hehe, far from it, and with a different goal
2 Likes
Oki
So let see what is hidden between the numbers! ,