Today I Learned:
Poison and venom are two different things.
Who knew?
- I did know.
- I Learned Today as well.
0 voters
Today I Learned:
Poison and venom are two different things.
Who knew?
0 voters
But knowing that you are wrong can be helpful, since you can work toward correcting that. In some cases, knowing that you are wrong confirms that the opposite is correct, by elimination.
If you donât know whether or not you are right, you can also work toward confirming or disproving that as well, however, that type of wording seems to imply that it is at least very difficult to figure that out.
It all depends on context. If I were trying to prove or disprove a mathematical result, which I know must be either true or false, I would be happy to be able to learn that my initial conjecture was wrong. However, making a correct conjecture in the first place, but then not being able to prove it is undesirable.
Both of those words come from Latin, by the way.
poison from pótió, venom from uenénum.
The native, and extinct, English word is apparently ĂĄtor, cognate with Swedish etter.
Edit: Not so extinct? Wiktionary suggests a dialectal descendant atter.
(Apologies if I sniped Sanonius)
Nah, 'tâs all good. I didnât know about the Germanic root! We just say Gift which is obviously because you give it to somebody.
I sorta learned today. Although I talk to someone sometimes online that goes by Poison so when I hear Poison I kinda think of them. Isnât venom from animals that bites though and poison can come from venom but it can come from other stuff too? Otherwise idk.
I donât remember where @martin3141 is from (sorry * ) but it seems all native speakers knew. I guess itâs because thereâs no such distinction in my language (that I know of) and I never happened to come across a text that had to do with that before. Well, itâs always nice to learn something new.
*if you are a native English speaker, double sorry, oops.
@Haze_with_a_Z According to Australian Academy of ScienceâŠ
https://www.science.org.au/curious/people-medicine/poison-vs-venom#:~:text=Poison%20is%20a%20toxin%20that,or%20absorption%20through%20the%20skin.&text=Venom%20is%20a%20specialised%20type,via%20a%20bite%20or%20sting.
To be fair, I know thereâs a difference, but I donât know what it is.
Maybe I interpreted the poll differently than others, but hereâs my view:
I assume âknowing that youâre wrongâ means that you claim something is true of which you know it is not. Hence youâre either spreading disinformation (âfake newsâ) or youâre taking a stance to win an argument instead of finding a solution (non-constructive argumentation). I see both as terrible.
âNot knowing that youâre rightâ on the other hand is just everyday business. I think I know things, but Iâm usually uncertain about them.
However, mathematically I would not know my conjecture, or else Iâd claim it to be a theorem. The fact that it is a conjecture means that âI did not know that I was rightâ (or more correctly, at that point I âdid not know whether I was rightâ)
I would rather state a conjecture that is difficult to prove / disprove and hence interesting, than state a conjecture that can easily be proven wrong.
The question depends a lot on context, but isnât the fun in polls like these to see peopleâs interpretations, or to try to find arguments even without any context? At least I think thatâs fun ^^
Hereâs another reason why I prefer ânot knowing if Iâm rightâ. Consider the laws of physics. I suppose many people would say that we know that these laws apply, right? I believe that is wrong (strictly speaking). Over the course of history, the up-to-date theory of physics has changed countless times, and I believe it will keep changing and evolving in the future. This theory is the best model weâve come up with to describe the world we observe, but is not necessarily the âunderlying truthâ. In this sense even researchers âdonât know if theyâre rightâ. Then that canât be such a bad thing, right?
Ok this has 350 replies. Way more than I thought it did. hahaha
0 voters
0 voters
999 replies = 1k posts, right?
Yes, as the topic is considered a post in the post counter on the side. As such, it counts. However, the topic does not count as a âpostâ on the user leaderboard, or user statistics; topics are considered separate from âpostsâ (replies). It depends on where you are talking about it.
I consider the topic a post. @Haze_with_a_Z was asking about it hitting 1k posts, which is 999 replies. Even if @mark5000 did close the thread at 999 replies, then we would still have accomplished Hazeâs goal.
Anyway, this thread is a polls thread, soâŠ
0 voters
I knew before but I kind of keep forgetting it - itâs only part of my passive vocabulary. I still need to actively remind myself in order not to use the wrong word.
How much do you type and how much do you write (as in pen and paper)*?
0 voters
*approximate percentages, otherwise itâs a whole long line
Has this changed recently, because of the whole pandemic thing, comparing to yourself before?
0 voters
I put I only type because I mostly type, but whenever Iâm trying to work on a problem or brainstorm something or note down players interested in a TMG Tourney, I get out my mechanical pencil and legal pad.
I take all kinds of notes on paper, but I donât note that much
Itâs too random and rare.
Depends on what it is. With maths I always write by hand (the last few years on computer, with a writing tablet). But I write by far the most things here on the forum or on the main site.