Apparently forenoon is a word. I’m not sure I’ve ever actually heard it said, though. It sounds quite dated and obscure.
I suspect that discobot tries to tell us that it can not roll a 750 sided die. How about we roll two dice: a 75 sided and a 10 sided one?
@discobot roll 1d75
Did you know that the maximum number of sides for a mathematically fair die is 120?
73
@discobot roll 1d10
8
73x10 + 8 - 1 = 737 is our new random number.
Ah, I did suspect that…
Actually @Vsotvep I’ve been studying the table and I think 630 is in fact a fairer roll, since otherwise there’s a bias to Rongorongo which sits at the end. You want to do it again?
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Script_(Unicode)#List_of_scripts_in_Unicode is my reference btw)
@discobot roll 1d62
55
@discobot roll 1d10
6
We always get the weird ones, huh.
556
(Actually I should just go up to 62, otherwise we would have gotten things over 630… I’m a rubbish mathematician)
I was thinking today: "what are the oldest words for which we have recorded history?"
I’ve decided on a cut-off point of 1000 BCE.
Akkadian 𒁲 𒊑 => 𒅆𒂍𒉪 => ziggurat
Akkadian 𒂵𒈬𒉡 =~> Ancient Greek κύμινον => Latin cuminum => Old English cymen => Middle English comin => cumin
Aramaic נצב to מצב to מצטבתא => Arabic مِصْطَبَة => mastaba
Aramaic שולטנא => Arabic سُلْطَان => Turkish سلطان => French sultan => sultan
Egyptian bḫn => Ancient Greek βάσανος => Latin basanites => Latin Latin basaltes => basalt
Egyptian hbnj => Ancient Greek ἔβενος => Latin hebenus => Ecclesiastical Latin ebenius => Middle English hebenyf => ebony
Egyptian ꜣbw =?> Ancient Greek ἐλέφᾱς => Latin elephantus => Old French elefant => elephant
Egyptian ꜣbw => Demotic yb => Latin ebur => eboreus => Anglo-Norman ivurie => Middle English ivorie => ivory
Egyptian wḥꜣt => Demotic wḥj => Ancient Greek Ὄᾰσῐς => Latin Latin Oasis => oasis
Egyptian pr ꜥꜣ => Hebrew פַּרְעֹה => Ancient Greek Φαραώ => Late Latin Pharao => Old / Middle English pharao => pharoah
Hebrew פלשת to פלשתים to Ancient Greek Φυλιστῖνοι => Late Latin Philistinus => philistine
Hebrew סְדֹם => Ancient Greek σοδομίτης => Latin sodomita => sodomite
Hebrew אשקלון => Latin ascalonia => Medieval Latin escalonia => Middle French eschalote => French échalote => shallot
Phoenician 𐤀 => Ancient Greek ἄλφα => alpha
Phoenician 𐤂𐤁 to 𐤂𐤁𐤋 => Ancient Greek Βῠ́βλος => βύβλος => βυβλίον => βῐβλῐ́ον => βιβλιογράφος => _ βιβλιογραφία_ => bibliography
Sanskrit उपरि => उपल => Byzantine Greek ὀπάλλιος => Latin opalus => French opale => opal
Sanskrit रोटिका => Hindi रोटी => roti
Sanskrit लाक्षा => Hindi लाख => Persian لاک => Portuguese laca => French lacque => lacquer
Sanskrit पिप्पली => Persian پلپل possibly to Arabic فلفل to فَلَافِل => falafel
Sanskrit शृङ्गवेर => Sauraseni Prakrit सिङ्गबेर => Ancient Greek ζιγγίβερις => Latin zingiberi => Medieval Latin gingiber => Middle English gingifer => gingivere => gingere => Modern English ginger
Sanskrit पर्पट => Tamil பப்படம் => papadam
Sumerian 𒄀𒈾 => Akkadian 𒄀 => Ancient Greek κάννα => Latin canna => canalis => Old / Middle French canal => canal
The Coptic word is ⲡⲣ̄ⲣⲟ p-ᵊrro, by the way, ⲡ- being the definite article.
I can imagine that ebony and oasis being other egyptian loanwords are similarly old.
Being a Germanic language, English is relatively poor in recorded ancient etymologies, if you want to go before Latin and Ancient Greek. I think the most fertile soil to find them in is probably:
- Chinese
- Indian languages
- Iranian
- Arabic
- Hebrew
- Coptic
It’s quite easy, just select the whole table below and copy it, you’ll see how it works
| A | B |
|---|---|
| C | D |
@Sanonius, about demonstrative pronouns: I wasn’t aware (or forgot) that Latin distinguishes distance between second person and third person. It’s like Japanese in that regard.
Japanese has it both for demonstrative pronouns and other demonstrative adverbs:
| First person | Second person | Third person | Interrogative |
|---|---|---|---|
| これ this one (near me) |
それ that one (near you) |
あれ that one (distant) |
どれ which |
| この this (near me) |
その that (near you) |
あの that (distant) |
どの what |
| ここ here (near me) |
そこ there (near you) |
あそこ there (distant) |
どこ where |
| こちら over here (near me) |
そちら over there (near you) |
あちら over there (distant) |
どちら which way |
| こう (in) this way / with my method |
そう (in) that way / with your method |
ああ (in) that way (distant) |
どう how |
| こんな this kind of (near me) |
そんな that kind of (near you) |
あんな that kind of (distant) |
どんな what kind of |
It existed in English as well, for example: here (proximity to speaker), there (proximity to listener), yonder (distant from both). In modern English there has largely absorbed the meaning of yonder.
Yonder was also used for the pronouns, see this Wiki page.
That looks really neat, thank you. It’s interesting how that system is extended not only to directions but also manners. It Latin there’s ita ‘this way’, and circumscriptions that literally mean ‘this way’, and ‘that way’ (hoc/isto/illo modo). I quite like the Japanese ああ〜…
German’s got three distances, too: hier, da, dort, but “da” is rather in general proximity than precisely around the listener. I wonder if there are languages with four or more. Maybe one for objects one can’t see.
Well, in English you can say “right here” or “to hand”.
“right here”
“here”
“there”
“over there” / “yonder”
It sorta works 
PS. yes, ofc no-one has said yonder this century