let a placement be the execution of that action which would be otherwise called a “move” when playing orthogo.
let a movette (/mu 'vɛt/) be an unbroken series of placements by one color.
let a move be a movette such that the placement immediately preceding (if any) and the placement immediately following (if any) are by the opposing color.
let a turn be that object during which a move is made.
Parameters of a Sente Movette
Each sente movette, of course, consists of either 1 or 2 placements.
A sente movette can either force the opponent to use 1 placement in response, or force them to use 2 placements in response.
Of the 1 or 2 placements which an opponent is forced to use in response to a sente movette, each may either need to be replied to on the opponent’s move immediately following the sente movette, or not need to be replied to until a later turn due to TM move order. This distinction I term “hard” and “soft” sente.
We need some way to differentiate in conversation between these 10 types of sente. Any suggestions? Or corrections if I’ve missed something or done something wrong?
I’d be interested. I’m curious to try out my idea for a physical tool to keep track of a 3 digit hexadecimal number while making the parity of the number transparent and allowing very fast adding of 1 to the total. If it proves workable, It would make live TMG games eminently practical without computer or paper aids.
I’d be available Mon. – Thurs. after around 9:00 pm UTC for a few hours, usually.
We’re both planning on keeping track of the move order using physical implements again, but Vsotvep is going to see if he can’t come up with his own so we can compare and hopefully learn from eachother’s attempts.
It’d be pleasant for OGS to be the home of Thue-Morse Go: our “indigenous variant”.
If we can get a community set up – I note that we already have an OGS group, which I’m a member of – and we can arrange at least a few games a week, we could set the snowball in motion.
What if we set up a Google-docs or something where people could post upcoming times and dates they would be interested in playing a game with someone, and other members can fill in their name if they would be able to play then?
Maybe a spreadsheet with columns for “Player 1 (posting challenge)”, “Player 2 (leave blank for open challenge; enclose with parens to challenge one player (and tag them somewhere else))”, “Game settings (can be a range)”, “Date/Time (UTC)”, “Misc. Notes”?
That would be cool. We could just let players schedule their games themselves with a different opponent each week until the tourney is finished. So if Alice, Bob, Carol, and Dave were the participants, Alice and Bob would find a time which works for them week one, as would Carol and Dave. Then Alice and Carol would play during week 2 while Bob and Dave do the same. Then Alice and Dave on week 3 along with Bob and Carol. (obviously order doesn’t matter much)
If anyone would like to play live games of TMG, I’d love to schedule some. My and Vsotvep’s game has been rescheduled until Friday, so I’m available at around 8:30pm UTC tomorrow, as well as all day (aside from my Vsotvep game) on Friday.